亚洲v欧美日韩一区|中国不卡视频免费一区二区|小黄片观看视频欧美|在线观看加勒比网站|丁香精品久久亚洲日本片|成人免费AV大片|美女婷婷综合骚妇无码|亚洲女人的大黑逼视频一区二区三区|成人操人在线播放|久久久一二三区

返回列表 發(fā)布新帖

[數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)] 【連載跟蹤】OECD關(guān)于數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)征稅以及雙支柱的研究進(jìn)展

5079 18 樓主
發(fā)表于 2020-1-10 06:37:28 | 只看樓主 閱讀模式
|
【特別關(guān)注】最佳方案:概念更明確 操作更簡(jiǎn)便
中國(guó)稅務(wù)報(bào)  2020年01月08日
作者:汪成紅
(作者系國(guó)家稅務(wù)總局杭州市稅務(wù)局干部,現(xiàn)派駐OECD)

2019年11月,由OECD發(fā)布的《“第一支柱”下“統(tǒng)一方法”的秘書(shū)處提案》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)《提案》)的公眾咨詢(xún)會(huì)在OECD總部法國(guó)巴黎召開(kāi),來(lái)自各國(guó)政府、商界、民間團(tuán)體及學(xué)術(shù)界的500多名代表參與,并提出了各自意見(jiàn)。會(huì)前,OECD秘書(shū)處共收到304份超過(guò)3000頁(yè)的評(píng)論性意見(jiàn),內(nèi)容聚焦《提案》中“三層分配機(jī)制”涉及的政策和技術(shù)問(wèn)題。據(jù)悉,OECD擬于2020年1月底前對(duì)《提案》基本框架達(dá)成共識(shí)。

“三層分配機(jī)制”設(shè)計(jì)的價(jià)值取向:在簡(jiǎn)單化與準(zhǔn)確性之間尋求最佳方案
《提案》擬在修改現(xiàn)行聯(lián)結(jié)度規(guī)則和利潤(rùn)分配規(guī)則的基礎(chǔ)上,賦予市場(chǎng)管轄區(qū)新的征稅權(quán),并提出了“金額A”“金額B”和“金額C”“三層分配機(jī)制”?!敖痤~A”指在跨國(guó)公司集團(tuán)層面使用公式方法分配給市場(chǎng)管轄區(qū)的剩余利潤(rùn)份額,適用于跨國(guó)公司集團(tuán)在市場(chǎng)管轄區(qū)內(nèi)不存在經(jīng)營(yíng)實(shí)體的情形,是對(duì)“統(tǒng)一方法”的主要回應(yīng);“金額B”指運(yùn)用獨(dú)立交易原則對(duì)跨國(guó)公司集團(tuán)在市場(chǎng)管轄區(qū)內(nèi)的基準(zhǔn)分銷(xiāo)和營(yíng)銷(xiāo)活動(dòng)確立固定回報(bào);“金額C”指當(dāng)跨國(guó)公司集團(tuán)在市場(chǎng)管轄區(qū)的活動(dòng)超出了“金額B”對(duì)應(yīng)的基準(zhǔn)水平時(shí),所給予的額外補(bǔ)償。
對(duì)此,許多代表提出,應(yīng)認(rèn)真考量“三層分配機(jī)制”設(shè)計(jì)的價(jià)值取向。為防止各國(guó)單邊行動(dòng),雖然有必要采取全球統(tǒng)一的征稅方案,但在考慮政治因素的同時(shí),方案設(shè)計(jì)應(yīng)兼顧行政和遵從成本,盡可能清晰和便于操作,在簡(jiǎn)單化與準(zhǔn)確性之間尋求最佳方案。同時(shí),應(yīng)重點(diǎn)關(guān)注國(guó)際稅收規(guī)則改變后,對(duì)稅收確定性、稅收遵從度、稅收爭(zhēng)端預(yù)防和解決機(jī)制以及消除雙重征稅可能產(chǎn)生的影響。不少代表建議,可采取“一站式服務(wù)”,即由一個(gè)司法管轄區(qū)對(duì)新的利潤(rùn)分配機(jī)制進(jìn)行統(tǒng)一管理,包括稅額的計(jì)算、征收等。此外,鑒于新的規(guī)則涉及對(duì)原有規(guī)則的改變,需要各國(guó)及時(shí)修訂國(guó)內(nèi)法和相關(guān)國(guó)際條約。

“三層分配機(jī)制”涉及的具體政策與技術(shù)問(wèn)題:明確相關(guān)概念,尊重現(xiàn)行規(guī)則
關(guān)于“金額A”的適用范圍與概念定義。從《提案》內(nèi)容看,“金額A”的適用范圍,不僅是高度數(shù)字化的跨國(guó)公司集團(tuán),還擴(kuò)大至面向消費(fèi)者的經(jīng)營(yíng)活動(dòng)。不少代表認(rèn)為,既然新的征稅方案是為了應(yīng)對(duì)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)挑戰(zhàn),其重點(diǎn)就是數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)企業(yè),不應(yīng)擴(kuò)大至面向消費(fèi)者的經(jīng)營(yíng)活動(dòng),且哪些活動(dòng)屬于面向消費(fèi)者的經(jīng)營(yíng)活動(dòng),仍需進(jìn)一步明確。咨詢(xún)會(huì)上,來(lái)自銀行業(yè)、保險(xiǎn)業(yè)和制藥業(yè)的企業(yè)代表們提出,其所在行業(yè)有非常嚴(yán)格的行業(yè)管理規(guī)范,特別是銀行業(yè)客戶(hù)更多的是企業(yè)消費(fèi)者,而非個(gè)人消費(fèi)者,考慮到企業(yè)與企業(yè)間的業(yè)務(wù)相對(duì)比較規(guī)范,建議將銀行業(yè)等排除在“金額A”的適用范圍之外。也有不少代表認(rèn)為,現(xiàn)有的獨(dú)立交易原則應(yīng)用得十分成功,沒(méi)有必要?jiǎng)?chuàng)建新的利潤(rùn)分配規(guī)則。
關(guān)于“金額B”的確定問(wèn)題。不少代表認(rèn)為,位于市場(chǎng)管轄區(qū)的子公司或常設(shè)機(jī)構(gòu)的基準(zhǔn)分銷(xiāo)與營(yíng)銷(xiāo)活動(dòng),因行業(yè)、地區(qū)和業(yè)務(wù)活動(dòng)的不同,而各有差異,很難確定一個(gè)固定回報(bào),而一旦“金額B”存在太多的爭(zhēng)議,必然引起“金額C”和涉稅爭(zhēng)議。有代表建議,應(yīng)尊重現(xiàn)行的獨(dú)立交易原則,只有該原則無(wú)效時(shí),再考慮采用固定回報(bào)的方法,簡(jiǎn)化當(dāng)前的轉(zhuǎn)讓定價(jià)規(guī)則;此外,應(yīng)明確定義何謂基準(zhǔn)分銷(xiāo)與營(yíng)銷(xiāo)活動(dòng),并且在確定固定回報(bào)時(shí),數(shù)據(jù)的獲得與保密都需要進(jìn)一步探索。
關(guān)于“金額C”的爭(zhēng)議預(yù)防與解決機(jī)制問(wèn)題。許多代表?yè)?dān)心,現(xiàn)行方案太過(guò)復(fù)雜,太多定義不明確,會(huì)嚴(yán)重影響稅收確定性。他們認(rèn)為,爭(zhēng)議重在預(yù)防,建議從政策設(shè)計(jì)的源頭減少爭(zhēng)議的產(chǎn)生。對(duì)于爭(zhēng)議解決,目前主要有兩個(gè)觀點(diǎn):一種觀點(diǎn)贊成運(yùn)用現(xiàn)行的預(yù)約定價(jià)安排(APA)和相互協(xié)商程序(MAP)解決爭(zhēng)議,同時(shí)輔以強(qiáng)制性的、約束力的仲裁;另一種觀點(diǎn)反對(duì)采用強(qiáng)制性的仲裁,建議在MAP的基礎(chǔ)上,探索新的爭(zhēng)議解決方式,絕大部分發(fā)展中國(guó)家代表支持該觀點(diǎn)。

OECD下一步計(jì)劃:制定出各國(guó)均認(rèn)同的全球統(tǒng)一征稅方案
在咨詢(xún)會(huì)當(dāng)天,OECD稅收政策與行政管理中心副主任格雷斯表示,咨詢(xún)會(huì)非常有意義,秘書(shū)處將根據(jù)意見(jiàn)對(duì)《提案》作進(jìn)一步修改。首先,在政策定位上,雖然代表們目前存在諸多意見(jiàn),但總體贊成制定全球統(tǒng)一征稅方案,OECD也將朝著這一方向努力,制定出各國(guó)均認(rèn)同的方案;其次,關(guān)于“三層分配機(jī)制”的具體技術(shù)問(wèn)題,OECD表示,下一步將盡快對(duì)某些概念予以明確,有重點(diǎn)地解決相關(guān)問(wèn)題、澄清相關(guān)規(guī)則;再次,關(guān)于“金額A”,雖然很多代表反對(duì)創(chuàng)建新的利潤(rùn)分配規(guī)則,但國(guó)際稅改在即,為應(yīng)對(duì)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)挑戰(zhàn),只能往前走,不能再倒回到獨(dú)立交易原則,重新設(shè)計(jì)“金額A”;最后,關(guān)于爭(zhēng)議解決,OECD將探索新的有別于強(qiáng)制性仲裁的爭(zhēng)議解決方式,且新的爭(zhēng)議解決方式也同樣具有強(qiáng)制性和約束力,以進(jìn)一步提高稅收確定性。
(作者系國(guó)家稅務(wù)總局杭州市稅務(wù)局干部,現(xiàn)派駐OECD)
OECD 數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)雙支柱 
發(fā)表于 2020-6-30 09:08
OECD雙支柱方案推進(jìn)動(dòng)態(tài) 
發(fā)表于 2020-6-14 21:14
應(yīng)對(duì)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)雙支柱 四個(gè)提案 
發(fā)表于 2020-6-12 13:30

本帖被以下淘專(zhuān)輯推薦:

每天在稅務(wù)的學(xué)習(xí)上前進(jìn)一小步!

評(píng)論18

沙發(fā)
縱橫四海樓主Lv.10 發(fā)表于 2020-2-19 08:25:59 | 只看Ta

2月13日OECD公布了關(guān)于對(duì)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)征稅的“雙支柱”提案的經(jīng)濟(jì)和影響評(píng)估分析的初步結(jié)果(EN)
Report fromVasiliki Agianni, Research Associate, IBFD
OECDreleases preliminary results of economic and impact assessment analysis ontwo-pillar proposal towards taxing digital economy

On 13 February 2020, the OECD presenteda number of preliminary, high-level results on the economic and impactassessment analysis undertaken with respect to the implementation of thetwo-pillar approach towards addressing the tax challenges of the digitaleconomy (for further details on the two-pillar approach, see OECD-1, News 31January 2020).
The main purpose of the analysis is toinform ongoing discussions and, ultimately, key decisions on the design andparameters of the Pillar One and Pillar Two approach, to be taken by members ofthe Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) in theirnegotiations towards adopting a consensus-based solution to the tax challengesarising from digitalization. The analysis has been based on illustrativeassumptions that do not pre-judge decisions of the Inclusive Framework on BEPS,and has a broad geographic and company coverage including more than 200jurisdictions, comprising all members of the Inclusive Framework on BEPS and alarge number of developing countries, and more than 27,000 multinationalgroups. The analysis has taken into account data from a range of sources,combining data at firm level with aggregate data, and incorporates results atglobal and jurisdictional levels, taking into consideration high-income,middle-income and low-income jurisdictions and investment hubs. Nocountry-specific results have been presented as part of the preliminaryanalysis.
Thepreliminary findings on the combined overall impact of Pillar One and PillarTwo are as follows:
–the global net tax revenuegains are estimated to be up to 4% of the global corporate income tax (CIT)revenues, or USD 100 billion on an annual basis, depending on the reformdesign;
–the CIT revenue gains arebroadly similar across high-income, middle-income and low-income economies; and
–a significant reduction inprofit shifting is expected from the combined effect of the Pillar One andPillar Two reforms.
More specifically, the Pillar Onereform is expected to change the way jurisdictions allocate taxing rights amongeach other and carve up the "tax pie". However, Pillar One would leadto only a slight increase in global tax revenues as taxing rights would shiftfrom low-tax to higher tax jurisdictions. At a jurisdictional level, mosteconomies would experience slight CIT revenue gains, with low-income andmiddle-income economies gaining relatively more CIT revenue gains thanhigh-income economies, whereas investment hubs would experience a slight CITrevenue loss.
On the other hand, it is anticipatedthat the Pillar Two reform will contribute to a significant increase inadditional tax revenues across jurisdictions, depending upon the rate and thefinal design agreed. Furthermore, Pillar Two is expected to reduce profitshifting by eliminating tax rate differentials between jurisdictions andadversely affecting profit shifting incentives of multinational groups.Decrease in profit shifting would mainly benefit developing countries, as thosetend to be more negatively impacted by the profit shifting strategies ofmultinational groups.
Finally, the analysis indicates thatthe expected direct effect of the Pillar One and Pillar Two reforms oninvestment costs would be small in most countries with many firms beingcompletely unaffected by the reforms. Notwithstanding that, it is anticipatedthat the Pillar One and Pillar Two reforms will decrease the influence thattaxes have on investment location decision-making and contribute to moreinvestments being driven by other factors, such as infrastructure and labourcosts, leading to global growth.
In its statement on the two-pillarapproach towards addressing the tax challenges arising from the digitalizationof the economy, the Inclusive Framework on BEPS welcomes the good progress onthe economic and impact assessment analysis of the Pillar One and Pillar Twoproposals and highlights the fact that failure to reach a consensus-basedsolution to the tax challenges arising from digitalization would lead to morecountries adopting unilateral tax measures and, thus, greater uncertainty fortaxpayers and tax administrations. Also, Inclusive Framework on BEPS calls forcontinued efforts towards strengthening the analysis with caution due to datalimitations, and for a more detailed analysis on the investment and growthimpacts of the Pillar One and Pillar Two proposals before the end of March2020.
Media queries should be directed toPascal Saint-Amans, Director of the OECD Centre for Tax Policy andAdministration or Lawrence Speer in the OECD Media Office.

每天在稅務(wù)的學(xué)習(xí)上前進(jìn)一小步!
板凳
縱橫四海樓主Lv.10 發(fā)表于 2020-2-19 10:21:35 | 只看Ta
OECD又下一城,數(shù)字稅改勢(shì)如破竹
OECD發(fā)布應(yīng)對(duì)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)稅收挑戰(zhàn)方案經(jīng)濟(jì)影響分析結(jié)果

2020年一月底,OECD/G20稅基侵蝕與利潤(rùn)轉(zhuǎn)移(以下簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)“BEPS”)包容性框架(以下簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)“IF”)第八次會(huì)議決定采納兩個(gè)支柱的建議方案,加速推進(jìn)應(yīng)對(duì)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)稅務(wù)挑戰(zhàn)的進(jìn)程。2020年2月13日,IF如期公布了數(shù)字稅對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)影響的評(píng)估結(jié)果,顯示前景一片光明。根據(jù)IF公布的評(píng)估報(bào)告,擬推出的解決方案預(yù)計(jì)可以實(shí)現(xiàn)全球范圍內(nèi)企業(yè)所得稅增收4%,即每年增收1000億美元。

IF的分析報(bào)告稱(chēng)以上結(jié)論基于200多個(gè)國(guó)家以及27,000多家跨國(guó)公司數(shù)據(jù)的測(cè)算結(jié)果。從構(gòu)成上看,第一支柱下的“統(tǒng)一方法”通過(guò)向市場(chǎng)所在國(guó)分配征稅權(quán),會(huì)讓很多國(guó)家分一杯羹,而且中低收入國(guó)家受益會(huì)稍高于發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家。而增收的1000億美元中的大部分會(huì)由第二支柱通過(guò)縮小各國(guó)實(shí)際稅負(fù)的鴻溝帶來(lái),而且中低收入國(guó)家從中受益會(huì)明顯高于發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家。

既然是經(jīng)濟(jì)影響評(píng)估,當(dāng)然不能只講稅收,還要分析對(duì)投資的負(fù)面影響。IF的分析報(bào)告稱(chēng)對(duì)全球投資成本的影響不大。因?yàn)榻鉀Q方案針對(duì)的是利潤(rùn)很高的跨國(guó)企業(yè)集團(tuán),雖然半數(shù)以上增收都來(lái)自100家大企業(yè),但是他們財(cái)大氣粗,九牛一毛而已。況且這些企業(yè)以往交稅太少已經(jīng)激起民憤,理應(yīng)痛改前非。再說(shuō)稅改以后這些企業(yè)在選擇投資地的時(shí)候,也省得絞盡腦汁去比較稅負(fù)了,這也算是減負(fù)吧。

同時(shí)OECD威脅說(shuō),如果跨國(guó)公司不接受這個(gè)方案,那就等著各國(guó)采取單邊活動(dòng),結(jié)果會(huì)更慘。最近新官上任的英國(guó)首相約翰森宣布今年四月份引入數(shù)字稅,針對(duì)在線(xiàn)瀏覽、社交媒體平臺(tái)和電子商務(wù)征收,稅率為2%。此前法國(guó)擬推出類(lèi)似的數(shù)字稅,結(jié)果美國(guó)威脅針對(duì)法國(guó)紅酒和奶酪回報(bào)以關(guān)稅,法國(guó)妥協(xié),答應(yīng)押后到年底再議。美國(guó)也曾放話(huà),誰(shuí)敢再提數(shù)字稅美國(guó)照方抓藥。英國(guó)這是明知山有虎,且向虎山行。接下來(lái)且看英美如何博弈。特朗普肯定首選關(guān)稅,只是針對(duì)什么商品尚待觀察。不管如何博弈,單邊行動(dòng)受傷的總是跨國(guó)公司。

因此,跨國(guó)公司已經(jīng)無(wú)心戀戰(zhàn)。民眾這方面對(duì)避稅非常不滿(mǎn),互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)怎敢掉以輕心?有好事者質(zhì)問(wèn)臉書(shū)2018年在英國(guó)取得16.5億英鎊的收入為何只交稅2850萬(wàn)英鎊,稅負(fù)率不到2%?臉書(shū)老板扎克伯格趕緊表示大家的心情是可以理解的,對(duì)OECD領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的稅制改革是支持的,盼望OECD在年底如期完成方案細(xì)節(jié),如果要臉書(shū)多交稅,也是沒(méi)有二話(huà)的。

每天在稅務(wù)的學(xué)習(xí)上前進(jìn)一小步!
合作請(qǐng)留言或郵件咨詢(xún)

1479971814@qq.com

未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載,復(fù)制和建立鏡像,
如有違反,追究法律責(zé)任
  • Tax100公眾號(hào)
Copyright © 2026 Tax100 稅百 版權(quán)所有 All Rights Reserved. Powered by Discuz! X5.1 京ICP備19053597號(hào)-1, 電話(huà)18600416813, 郵箱1479971814@qq.com
關(guān)燈 在本版發(fā)帖
Tax100公眾號(hào)
返回頂部
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表